|FWD: Scale||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: BARANSKI (BARANSKIVEAMF1.NL.NUWC.NAVY.MIL)|
|Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 10:12 CDT|
Path: nntp.nta.no!nac.no!nntp-oslo.uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!trane.uninett.no!sunic!mcsun!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tsuchiya From: tsuchiya [at] athena.mit.edu (N John Tsuchiya) Newsgroups: alt.architecture Subject: "Scale" and Psychology Date: 17 Sep 1993 22:35:07 GMT Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 56 Distribution: world Message-ID: <27de2r$hfh [at] senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: m14s-010-4.mit.edu "Scale" and "proportion" are two vague concepts which many people throw around without actually defining what they are talking about. I feel that they are two sides of the same thing. "Scale" has to do with how people perceive connections between two different sized objects. Good scale results in the two objects have a sense of being related. How can this be achieved? According to perceptual psychology, one manner that this can be achieved has been documented. For most objects, the human eye can perceive the grain or texture of the object. As mentioned in Christopher Alexander's _A_Pattern_Language_, if the size of the object is between 5:1 and 10:1 of the size of the grain (i.e., about 1/2" for most materials), then people can perceive a relationship between the grain and the object itself. That is, the object is perceived as being the next step in an hierarchy of sizes, rather than a disconnected level in the hierarchy. This can be gradually extended to the entire building (or any object). The next group of objects should be between 5:1 and 10:1 of the size of the 1/2" objects, etc., until the entire building is between 5:1 and 10:1 of the next to last level of the heirarchy of scales. Interestingly enough, parking lots with less than 7 cars are perceived to be "friendly" while anything larger to be an inhuman mass. (Also from Alexander). Alexander also gives the example of how office workers prefer to have in their immediate sight, 8 or less co-workers. Another example is that apartment buildings which are divided so that each hall has 6 or less rooms has significantly less crime than where the halls are divided with more rooms per hall (from Albert Mehrabian's _Public_Places_and_Private_Spaces_). A reason why this may be so is mentioned in an article by George Miller (in the book, _Readings_in_Perception_, eds. Beardslee and somebody else). The article, titled "The Magical Number Seven: Some Limits on Our Capacity to Process Information," explains the concept of "Span of Attention." This is the limit to which a person can tell exactly the number of dots that are flashed on a screen for 1/5 of a second. It turns out that when there are 6 or less, people can tell exactly how many there are, which is called "subitizing." For more than 6 dots, people must always estimate. Following from this, if a person can tell exactly the number of objects (grains, cars, co-workers, or rooms), then they will feel that they have the situation fully under control. That is, they won't be overwhelmed with so many objects that they cannot keep track of each of them, at least subconsciously. Perhaps this can lead to a "demistification" of the ideas of scale and proportion. Several hitches still exist though: In a building, how do you differentiate the different scaled parts without destroying the whole (how do people perceive different parts within a whole)? What role do other factors play in the perception of scale other than actual size (such as color)? I suppose these are the next steps.... John Tsuchiya
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.