|Re: Quorum definition?||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: BARANSKI (BARANSKIVEAMF1.NL.NUWC.NAVY.MIL)|
|Date: Mon, 15 Nov 93 14:55 CST|
From: hartman [at] informix.com (Robert Hartman) I think it depends on your decision-making process. If you follow the conventional majority-vote process, then a quorum should be a sufficient percentage to make it difficult to hold a secret or stacked meeting. If you use a consensus process, then a quorum should be a sufficient percentage to allow everyone's perspective to be represented. For instance, if I have a principled disagrement with a proposal on the agenda and would block approval if I were present, someone who is aware of that could block that proposal on my behalf while other business could take place. I should think that if you feel strongly against an item on the agenda of a proposed meeting, it behooves you to be there to represent how you feel. It's a lot easier then expecting someone else to represent you accurately. Jim.
- Re: Quorum definition?, (continued)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.