|Re: RE- the politics of co-h||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Stephen Lewin-Berlin (berlinvireo.com)|
|Date: Wed, 16 Mar 94 07:56 CST|
I think that -consensus- is one of those words that has been misused and abused to the point that it is difficult to know if people are speaking of the same thing. On the issue at hand - coming to consensus on the name of a group - I certainly believe that it can be done. My definition of consensus does not require that everybody agrees that the decision made is their *favorite* choice - merely that nobody is prepared to *block* the choice. So, a possible process might be: Gather a list of possibilities If anybody *really doesn't like* a choice, strike it from the list All the choices remaining (if any) pass the "consensus test" - nobody will block them. Now, any process that selects among them is ok, e.g.: Give everybody (1? 3? 11?) votes, and let them cast votes for their favorite(s). The choice which gets the most votes wins, unless somebody blocks a final query. Voila, consensus. -- Steve Rose Tree Cohousing
- Re: RE- the politics of co-h Laura Bagnall, March 15 1994
- Re: RE- the politics of co-h BARANSKI, March 16 1994
- Re: RE- the politics of co-h IAN_HIG, March 16 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.