Re: Leave of Absence <FWD> | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 00:34 CDT |
Pablo Halpern phalpern [at] world.std.com is the author of this message but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop. > From: Dan Ardoin <71045.2023 [at] compuserve.com> > > I like the idea that her time stops while she is away > (Angie McGowan). I would add that letting the clock run while someone does not participate and pay dues would be unfair. Our development has become a serious speculative investment, with tens of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours at risk. Anybody not paying their fair share is increasing the risk for everybody else (this goes for people behind in their payments, as well). If someone has a lot of seniority, then stopping the clock will allow other people to slowly catch up without unfairly penalizing the person on leave. > > For the most part this is really not needed. The group found out that > there was almost no conflict in choice of lot location. But since this > situation cropped up, they wondered how others might have handled absence Consider yourselves lucky. - Pablo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pablo Halpern (508) 435-5274 phalpern [at] world.std.com New View Neighborhood Development, Acton, MA ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.