Group reluctance to incorporate <FWD> | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholsonmaroon.tc.umn.edu) | |
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 08:18 CDT |
Steve Farley (sfarley [at] igc.apc.org) is the author of this message but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop. I am a new member of the Tucson cohousing group, and we seem to be entering an important stage in the development of the group--the moment when wecut bait. Part of the group is ready to go ahead and put an option on a site, and part wants to move more slowly. Even some of the site-option contingent are reluctant to establish legal status for the group (incorporation, partnership, etc.) prior to optioning the land. How have other groups handled this phase of the process? I know a lot of cohousers have been lucky enough to have a member with means just go ahead and buy land on their own to get things going, but even then, some sort of legal status seems to be necessary before anyone buys land to make us appear legitimate in the eyes of developers, banks, and new members. Any thoughts? Thanks, Steve Farley (sfarley [at] igc.apc.org)
-
Group reluctance to incorporate <FWD> Fred H Olson WB0YQM, September 14 1994
- RE: Group reluctance to incorporate <FWD> Rob Sandelin, September 14 1994
- Re: Group reluctance to incorporate <FWD> Stephen Hawthorne, September 20 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.