|Re: 501(c)3 vs Mutual benefit||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: RLob4Grell (RLob4Grellaol.com)|
|Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 00:17 CST|
Gary Shapero writes >What is the advantage of being a 501(c)3 nonprofit cohousing group as >opposed to a mutual benefit nonprofit corporation? Does it depend on what >kind of money you are trying to get access to? We have trod this path in San Luis Obispo to some extent. You will probably never be eligible for 501(c)3 but there is precident to be classified as 501(c)4. They are both tax exempt. The difference is that the (c)3 can accept charitable donations, like a church, whereas (c)4 cannot. Our present legal entity is a CA non-profit mutual benefit as opposed to 'public benefit'. The non-profit seems to help us as far as PR goes but otherwise it seems to have no specific value (However, I am not a lawyer). As it got time to get tax advice from our accountants it became apparent that we should investigate 501(c)4. Ultimately we have chosen to not attempt to get tax exemption since this entity is for developing property and ultimately it may, if our scheme works out, buy and sell property. The idea being that it has assests which can be used to excersize right of first refusal on units for sale. We may however, end up with two legal entities if it makes financial sense. One as the property buyer/seller and one which is a tax exempt Homeowners Association. If you want to persue the 501(c)4 avenue the key is that your development must be considered a 'community ' and would be a planned unit development (PUD) instead of a condo developent with a condo association. I would suggest that you enlist a Real Estate Tax planning consultant. They would ultimately make the argument for your case based on past rulings by the IRS. These are called 'Revenue Rulings' which I will quote the synopses written at the end of some of those I now have. The most important case, the _Roe v. Wade_ of 501(c)4 rulings is the _Rancho Santa Fe Association v. USA_ 1/31/84. The stuff germaine to tax planners is: 1) This case states "a neighborhood, precinct, subdivision or housing development may consititute a 'community' for purposes of IRC Section 501(c)(4). 2)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.