|Re: Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites [FWD]||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: tom ponessa (tom_ponessatvo.org)|
|Date: Sat, 28 Jan 95 17:09 CST|
Eric Fronberg replies: >These issues are personal and what is exceptable for one is >intolerable for another I found living near a concentration of carbon monoxide completely unacceptable and my concern is particularly for any children that may live there. You're right, I don't know the site but I'm familiar with the risks. Health comes first and as a concerned person I felt (and feel) the need to speak out about potential dangers. I appreciate the frustration of a long search but that shouldn't be a reason for compromising too much. At the least have an air quality check done. > These members say that the sound has more of a >'white noise' quality to it than where they live. Noise (white or any other flavour) induces stress and if people are susceptible then they should think twice. I stand by what I said before. To me, a site so close to noise and pollution is really questionable.
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.