Re: Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites [FWD] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stuart Staniford-Chen (staniforcs.ucdavis.edu) | |
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 95 18:09 CST |
> I stand by what I said before. To me, a site so close to noise and pollution > is really questionable. What if that site is the only option (easy to believe in a crowded urban area)? Is it better to deal with the noise and pollution, or to deal with continued living in single family housing? It seems to me there is no right answer - it depends on one's priorities and how much one fears the various risks/stresses. Everyone has to come to their own answer and it won't be the same in all cases. Stuart. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuart Staniford-Chen | Dept of Computer Science stanifor [at] cs.ucdavis.edu | UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616 (916) 752-2149 - work | and (916) 756-8697 - home | N St. Cohousing Community Home page is http://everest.cs.ucdavis.edu/~stanifor/home.html
-
Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites [FWD] Fred H Olson WB0YQM, January 28 1995
- Re: Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites [FWD] tom ponessa, January 28 1995
- Re: Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites [FWD] Stuart Staniford-Chen, January 28 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.