Re: Cost of land vs. lots | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sally S. Leach (sleachmail.utexas.edu) | |
Date: Thu, 18 May 95 09:34 CDT |
In message Wed, 17 May 95 11:14 CDT, Rob Sandelin <robsan [at] microsoft.com> writes: > Harry Pasternak wrote: > * It makes sense to buy a bigger piece of land and keep to single family > homes. By the way, the price of land drops drastically if the parcel is 25 > acres or more--typically, one lot will cost the same as 25 acres! > > This might be true, in the beginning. Then you start adding up the > "development costs"... Three cheers for you Rob: this is the kind of meaty and informational mail that is a big help. I would appreciate more detail, i.e. a checklist of all the various costs you used in developing the data in your msg. If this is too long for this list, send direct to Sleach [at] mail.utexas.edu. Again, many kudos for an interesting note. Thomas Leach, Architect and Contractor.
-
Re: Cost of land vs. lots Rob Sandelin, May 17 1995
- Re: Re: Cost of land vs. lots Harry Pasternak, May 18 1995
- Re: Cost of land vs. lots Sally S. Leach, May 18 1995
- Re: Cost of land vs. lots Rob Sandelin, May 18 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.