Re: Multi-level cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 May 95 16:48 CDT |
Jerry Callen jcallen [at] world.std.com is the author of the message below but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop (Fred). **************** FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS ********************* Harry Pasternak (Harry_Pasternak [at] tvo.org) writes: * All research shows that folks preferr single family detached first, then single family attached (row,cluster on crescent) second, other types follow [...] I've always found side-by-side duplexes appealing. By sharing a wall (and some infrastructure) you can get some energy and construction cost savings with little loss of privacy or light. * Want cheap land in cities? Buy a crappy house on the biggest corner lot you can find (located where you want it)--knock down the house and do a zero lot line, in-fill cohousing neighborhood. Voila! Contact Claude Miquelle at Claude Miquelle and Associates in Boston if you want the "expert" on this notion. But check out the zoning first; certainly eastern Massachusetts is chock full of towns that won't let you do this without a variance. -- Jerry Callen jcallen [at] world.std.com "The best lack conviction, given some time to think, and the worst are full of passion without mercy." -- Joni Mitchell
-
Multi-level cohousing Joaniblank, May 15 1995
- Re: Multi-level cohousing Harry Pasternak, May 17 1995
- Re: Multi-level cohousing David G Adams, May 17 1995
- Re: Multi-level cohousing Fred H Olson WB0YQM, May 18 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.