Neighbours | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Collaborative Housing Society (cohosoc![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 21:13:50 -0500 |
To continue Rob (Sandelin - thanks Rob for being direct!) call for working *with* neighbours rather than trying to select them, I wanted to relate a recent discussion I had with a group of people who are actively pursuing a cohousing development. They mentioned all the reasons why coho appealed - community, contact, sharing, etc. The interesting point is that they are talking about doing this in a neighbourhood that is already a pretty good place to live, from any point of view - close-by amenities, fairly dense, well-cared for homes, an identifiable locale, with strong community spirit. A newcomer to the discussion had the naivity to ask why they were bothering with coho? Didn't they already have it? And if they wanted to be such good neighbours, why weren't the neighbours involved in the discussion? Good questions, met with blank stares and a long silence. I suspect they became entranced with the lovely photos in the coho book, and were more into the "bondage scene" (refering to a much earlier remark about all this on this list) of developing a new community than tackling the less glamourous job of dealing with the community they already lived in. I also wonder why N-Street didn't make it into The CoHousing Book - maybe the next edition? Russell Mawby Toronto cohosoc [at] web.apc.org
-
Neighbours Collaborative Housing Society, October 18 1995
- Re: Neighbours Stuart Staniford-Chen, October 18 1995
- Re: Neighbours Douglas Simons, October 18 1995
- Re: Neighbours Jerry Callen, October 19 1995
- Re: Neighbours Bill Dean, October 19 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.