Re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: James Kalin (jfkalin![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:51:42 -0500 |
Howdy folks: Urban/suburban sprawl annually takes enormous amounts of prime ag land out of production. Conventional wisdom is that the only way to halt loss of ag land production is to stop building new residential developments in ag communities and force new development into ever denser existing suburban/urban communities. Conventional wisdom is wrong. Properly designed sububan and rural residential developments can actually increase ag yields instead of decreasing or eliminating them. Cohousing projects should include agricultural land uses if they're concerned about sprawl taking ag lands out of production. Having worked as an ag advisor back in the late 70's, I know what can be done with ground around buildings, trellising of walls or a creative use of roofs. Where enough land is available, a farming (by "farming" I mean grains, vegies, orchards, or aquaculture) operation can be operated within the residential community. This is not to say you should operate a "factory floor" agribusiness farm, with the usual reliance on heavy machinery and agrichemicals. An organic farming operation, on the other hand, can be quite a community asset. Living in a community integrated within an well designed organic farming operation would create a wonderfully rich old world farming village atmosphere. Examples of recent residential developments integrated with farming include Prairie Crossing (near Grayslake, Illinois) and Tryon Farm (near Michigan City, Indiana). Community Supported Agriculture projects (CSAs) provide an excellent organizational structure for cohousing groups interested in integrating ag land uses into their projects. More than 500 CSAs have been created since 1985. As a CSA shareholder you are obligated to pay a share of the farm annual operating costs. In essence, you lease or own the farm. In return, shareholders get organic "vine-ripened" food, typically 20-30% cheaper than regular supermarket food. A CSA farm operating on a cohousing site could provide good jobs to a few or more professional farmers and provide organic food to cohousing and neighborhood CSA shareholders. Existing cohousing developments should reevaluate their current land use to try and "retrofit" farming into their communities. For example, from what I saw on a tour of Nyland was enough acreage to support a substantial truck gardening operation, even perhaps grains. Most cohousers are urban/suburban born and bred, so the idea of integrating farming into cohousing usually sounds fantastic, impractical, utopian, or messy. Play with idea. Invite some local organic market gardeners or farmers to tour your site and discuss how farming might be done on your cohousing property. Find a Permaculture professional with solid business sense, who could do a design workshop on your site. Have fun with the notion of living in a farming village! James Kalin
-
Re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl David L. Mandel, October 18 1995
- Re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl James Kalin, October 18 1995
- re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl fassnach, October 19 1995
- Re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl Joel Woodhull, October 20 1995
- re: Cohousing and suburban sprawl James Kalin, October 23 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.