Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eddie Matejowsky (e.matejowsky![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 16:44:05 -0600 |
At 12:26 PM 6/11/95 -0600, you wrote: >I second Eric Hart's concerns about foam core construction. > >The petrochemical industry, and polymer in particular, is a textbook >example of a polluting industry. If you are serious about minimizing use >of polluting technologies, particularly where cost-effective alternatives >exist, I recommend avoiding foam core. If equivalent cost-effective alternatives exist we'll all use them. I'm note in love with a petrochemical industry either. What I'm saying is look at all the pros and cons - the issue is very complex - labeling all plastics as bad and all re-newables as good is not in the best interest of the planet. For example some research (in new zealand I think) showed that paper cups are actually less 'green' than styro-foam ones because of the lots of energy and chemical processing goes into paper manufacture. The amount of raw material and energy per cu meter that goes into foam is probably fairly low. If I was given the task of reducing the worlds plastic consumption - foam insulation (especially in foam sandwich) is one of the last things I'd phase out and foam packaging is one of the first. Eddie.M. Edward Matejowsky. Queensland University of Technology Centre for Eye Research email E.MATEJOWSKY [at] QUT.EDU.AU Wk +61 73 864 5731 Hm +61 73 2825382
- Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core, (continued)
- Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core Eric D. Hart, November 5 1995
- Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core Eddie Matejowsky, November 5 1995
- Re: Manufactured housing-foam core Collaborative Housing Society, November 6 1995
- Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core James Kalin, November 6 1995
- Re: Manufactured Housing-Foam Core Eddie Matejowsky, November 6 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.