|RE: to develop or not to develop?||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rob Sandelin (Exchange) (RobsanExchange.MICROSOFT.com)|
|Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 11:16:36 -0500|
Many groups in Washington were resident developed: Winslow, Puget Ridge, Talking Circle, Rosewind, Sharingwood. However, this requires at least one, if not more, experienced developers acting as project managers. Also, in my opinion, the resident option takes a lot of time. I agree enough with Buzz and the notion of Nomad cohousing that I am pursuing the creation of a cohousing development entity, working with a developer or two, to create what may become, spec cohousing. Build it, then filter who buys through a pretty good group training and community building process. Might end up with cohousing, might end up condos. The only difference is the word "Community" which comes from the people, not the development. Rob Sandelin Who is now over 40 and old enough to know better
re:to develop or not to develop? Buzz Burrell, May 13 1996
- RE: to develop or not to develop? Rob Sandelin (Exchange), May 16 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.