|RE: Eco-Survey: car trusts||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: GREENCY (GREENCYaol.com)|
|Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 22:04:52 -0500|
>RE: Eco-Survey: car trusts From: Joshua Samos Perhaps the reason people have trouble accepting co-owning cars has to do with how the idea is presented. Instead of approaching it from the *eco* point of view, meaning *ecological,* try looking at if from *eco* meaning *economical.* The savings ought to be substantial for a family who co-owns a car, instead of owning it outright. Most cars--at least here in Chicago, where I live--sit idle 90% or more of the time. A family could therefore *sell* up to 90% of their second car and still have the use of it. A more reasonable arrangement might be to sell 50 to 75%, time-sharing the car on the basis of some schedule which works out with other people. For example: family A needs the car on Monday to go shopping; B needs it in the mornings and mid afternoons to drop off and pick up children from school; C wants a car on friday and saturday nights for drag racing, and hitting the bars ;-) etc. Imagine the insurance payments, maintenance, and loan payments being halved or more, and the car sharing makes sense. The main hurdles are with the private ownership thing. People need to learn to trust others with their personal vehicle. Everyone fears what others will do with their stuff: how driven, where parked, etc. Only education and trust will overcome these prejudices. We've all seen our neighbors drive and often have questions about their sanity, as they probably do about ours. Car -sharing requires an understanding of mutual responsibility and respect. However, the responsibility for a co-owned vehicle is spread out, and one's vulnerability to loss should decrease as the pool of responsibility grows. Imagine that 20 people want to share 5 cars. The 5 families who originally own the cars have bought in already by *donating* their cars; the other 15 families assume responsibility for the cars upkeep and payments until their equity in the vehicles reaches par with the original owners. For the *donating* family, this might mean owning use of their car for free for several years, while the others contribute to the pool. Of course, if the cars aren't already owned by members of the pool, then everyone would share in the purchase and upkeep of the vehicles from the start, but each person's buy-in level would be minimal. In the above example, everyone would have to pay only 25% of the price of owning a car, and have ample time to use it. Scheduling is the biggest hurdle. If everyone wants a car to drive to work, car sharing is impossible. Switching by days or half-days might be the simplest way. Each group can work this out as their needs dictate. Also, don't forget the value of car-pooling for common tasks like shopping. Thanks for reading, Josh Samos
RE: Eco-Survey: car trusts Rob Sandelin (Exchange), June 5 1996
- RE: Eco-Survey: car trusts GREENCY, June 6 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.