|Re: Rejecting New Members||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Buzz Burrell (72253.2101CompuServe.COM)|
|Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 21:31:00 -0500|
Re Valley Oaks Village - That was a tough story; I can only imagine how heart-wrenching it must have been. >Does any other group have the ability in your bylaws to reject someone? >On what objective basis can you reject someone? Could rejecting someone >be construed as discrimination? Specific responses - Geneva Community can reject someone, but that is not in our By-Laws (which are only for the legal and financial affairs of the development corporation). There is no objective basis for doing so. As long as they have the money, and commit to the Mission Statement and Agreements, then they can legally join. The word "discrimination" in my mind has a legal meaning. Thus, rejecting someone for non-objective reasons could definitly be construed as discrimination, *depending entirely on the legal framework of your organization*. Some legal entities can make subjective decisions on who joins and some can't. Overall responses - My initial reaction is if something like you describe happenned here, we would want to halt everything and figure this out. At least I hope we would do that; in the midst of construction, the pressure would certainly be on to put it aside because the construction required all available energy. But building community is about dealing with the issues you raised, not really about building houses. Regarding rejection of new members, we have no formal process for it. We talked about it, and our method would be for the individuals who are experiencing difficulty to work it out together. If that is not possible, then a third party member would participate. Its hard to imagine a problem going past that point, but if it did, we decided the issue would have to be brought before the group. There is no rules, committee, or other infrastructure set up to deal with it; our approach is based upon emotional maturity, communication skills, and our Mission Statement and Agreements. >From what I've seen so far, this works real well. What would happen if a >person came along who wanted to join, but (in our eyes) lacked "emotional maturity"? I'm not sure, but somehow I don't think they would ever want to join in the first place. When a group is real clear and positive, then assorted wierdnesses can't get a toehold. Hopefully. Take Care! Buzz Burrell Geneva Community Boulder, CO
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.