Re: Value vs. Cost | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: TomMOENCH (TomMOENCH![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 02:07:39 -0500 |
This value vs cost is interesting. It is actually pretty easy to come up with the cost per home based on calculating the square foot construction costs. The builder can break out the common house from the rest pretty easily. The cost of the houses (I don't live in a unit so I don 't call them units) then is determined. The assumption is that everyone should pay equally for a square foot of living space The above is not "truly equitable" because smaller homes or non-standard footprints actually cost more per square foot than larger ones. This area is a swamp and should be avoided unless you are really into social abuse. The subjective assignment of value to the homes is a real treat. We at Winslow did a bunch of that based on proximity to the street, the parking lot, the amount of shade, the lack of a "front yard", the property line and so on. After we moved in we found that what was valued more and what was less were almost irrelevant, especially to anyone who wanted to move in to cohousing period. My suggestion is to keep village members out of the pricing/appraising equation, let an outside professional do it and just accept it. At least that way there won't be any hard feelings between neighbors for lobbying for different house values. The appraiser can be blamed and forgotten. Good luck. Tom Winslow Cohousing
- Re: Value vs. Cost, (continued)
- Re: Value vs. Cost Paul Conahan, September 28 1996
- RE: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, September 28 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, September 28 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, October 18 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost TomMOENCH, October 21 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.