RE: Multi Family Strawbale Housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mmariner (Mmariner![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 12:35:51 -0500 |
Rob S sagely advises checking with banks before getting too committed to a technology such as straw bale. We all have the perception that banks tend to be very conservative and to shy away from anything that is unfamiliar, especially things that are "unproven." But many of these alternative building methods *are* proven to be sound by engineers, architets, building inspectors, etc., and are obviously a whole lot more sustainable. (As I write, I'm watching/hearing another "all wood" luxury house being built across the street.) Sigh. And somewhere (web sites, magazines, books) there must be documents that could be used as evidence of how viable these are. How about adding more of this to the cohousing resource guide or posting in the archives. The more we propagate this kind of information, the easier it will be for future groups to "sell" the concepts to banks, building inspectors, etc. The information should include specifics about cities and bulding sites where the structures did pass muster with existing inspectors and bankers. Let's share this wealth of information and make use of the pioneering work being done to reparadigm the building industry! Let's leverage our cohousing residents' participative role in the planning process to move toward sustainability. Michael M
-
Multi Family Strawbale Housing Sarah Kerr, October 21 1996
- RE: Multi Family Strawbale Housing Rob Sandelin, October 22 1996
- RE: Multi Family Strawbale Housing Mmariner, October 23 1996
- RE: Multi Family Strawbale Housing Denise Meier and/or Michael Jacob, October 23 1996
- RE: Multi Family Strawbale Housing Daniel Nachbar, October 24 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.