|Workshop/studio design and use issues||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Dahako (Dahakoaol.com)|
|Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:35:03 -0500|
Hey y'all - I've looked through the archives on this and can't find a discussion exactly on point. Answers can be emailed, or, if you will be at the conference, you can relay your reply via Sherri Zann Rosenthal. Background: Eno Commons is set up as a planned unit development subdivision (not condo or coop). We have space in our site plan designated to be a workshop (to be built after move-in). Round One: One of our current prospects raised the issue of using her own money to build a painting studio adjacent to the workshop - triggering a major discussion about private use of the public space. Under her proposal, she would pay to build the studio, use it, then give the space to the Homeowners Asc when she moves or dies. She is not comfortable sharing her art space with others - partly because she likes to leave her stuff out and partly because she has some specific health issues with off-gassing from certain solvents and paints. We weren't considering art space before her proposal, though one other member also paints regularly.The discussion has since branched out to cover use of the workshop, as well. With the workshop, we have two or three extremely dedicated wood/craft workers with lots of tools, about as many regular dabblers, and then the great unwashed masses. 1A) How has your group dealt with private construction/uses in common space? B) How has your group dealt physically and financially with sharing workshop, art, home office, or dance spaces? C) Does anyone have a neat workshop or studio design we can look over for inspiration? Round 2: One alternate proposal, that the studio be built on the house lot, connected to the house by a breezeway and using up most of the buildable space on the lot, has triggered even more passionate discussion about build-out on lots. Some strongly oppose "proliferation of structures" on environmental and aesthetic grounds; others feel they ought to be able to do whatever they want on their lots - without a lot of group backchat. (Remember, in our ownership model (subdivision), people own their lots conventionally, fee simple.) Much of the discussion centers on the question, "What can people do on their own property and when/how should the greater group get involved?" In its larger manifestation, this discussion expands to include fences and other outbuildings, and goes right to the critical balance point of privacy with community. 2A) How has your group dealt with use of/construction on private property? How have you determined whether the positive/negative impacts of such use or construction warrant neighborhood/group involvement? (I know the legal implications of this vary with the ownership structure - I'm looking for approaches.) B) If it was possible in your neighborhood, how have you evaluated custom home designs, especially those approaching the buildable maximum size? (We have two standard home designs, which almost everyone is using - but custom homes are quite possible.) Thanks for any constructive thoughts you may have on this. Even just reframing the questions might help. One of the wonderful things we're learning through this discussion is how committed each of our members are to this process. After particularly difficult sessions, my husband mutters darkly about just giving up this aggravation and buying a nice simple house in a regular neighborhood - then the next day he's back working things through. Jessie Handforth Kome Eno Commons Cohousing Durham, NC Infrastructure in; many trees still standing; looking for a few more good neighbors.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.