|Cohousing definitions continued||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rob Sandelin (Floriferousclassic.msn.com)|
|Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 20:01:32 -0500|
Whereas cohousing might be a vehicle to accomplish, in Scotts words: 1. a better environmental model for housing, land and energy use 2. a professed openness to the inclusion of those traditionally disenfranchised, 3. a local and democratic form of governance I am not sure I agree that the first two in any way define cohousing. Cohousing is the same environmental model as any other clustered land use, lots of those around that are not cohousing. Check out Civano for instance. Again, not sure that openness to disenfranchised is anything defining about cohousing either, lots and lots of situations are set up specifically for the disenfranchised. They are not cohousing either. What is Unique about cohousing? What sets it apart from other forms of housing and condos? I see that uniqueness as the combination of five elements: 1. it's resident conceived and driven, 2. Its goal is to create a closer community of neighbors by design, 3. It has democratic form of governance, 4. homes are owned by individuals, 5. it's run and maintained by the residents.
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.