Re: concerns about cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Sechrest (sechrest![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:21:14 -0600 |
-------- I do not currently live in an intentional community or cohousing. Although I have been interested in the issue for years. And I did live in a group house that we arranged about a decade ago. There is a dynamic tension between the role of the individual and role of community. The boundry of what is done for the individual and what is done for the community moves around a bit. And it is important to understand where the boundry is for what ever group you join up with. However, if you start the conversation from the point that "I (the individual) will have to sacrifice X to get community" then the conversation is doomed from the start. Privacy, space, meetings, communication are all part of working in any group. This get more intense as you move outside our cultural bounds and move into a tighter community. This tighter community will intensify issues, but it need not be a sacrifice. If instead of a scarifice, you look at this question as an "investment", you start the conversation on a better footing. To live in community is a commitment. It will only work if you are committed to working thru the issues that come up. If you make a commitment and then you invest your time, space and money into that community, you can gather a high return on your investment. However, like all investments, you have to be careful. There are many places that do not understand the needs for privacy in the same way that you do. And there are places where meetings are not effective and so are a bad investment of your time. But no community can survive without understanding the boundry between the private and the public. Nor can a community survive without effective communications. You have to decide for yourself what benifits you want to gain and gather from community. And then what investments you can make in order to acheive those gains. If you start from the point that you are making a sacrifice to be in community, then this "sacrifice" can become a sore point that festers. If you value the freedom and autonomy of the individual over the qualities of community. And you find no reason to change your individual behavior for the benifits of the group, then you need to go back and revisit the question of what commitment you can make to a community and what you hope to gain from it. Tonka444 <Tonka444 [at] aol.com> writes: % My wife has been a cohousing enthusiast for a couple of years now. I am on % the fence and would appreciate some candid input that might help alleviate (or % confirm) my concerns. Here they are: % % 1. Lack of privacy. I'm not antisocial but I like to socialize on my own % terms, when and as often (or little) as I want. The phrase"intentional % community" sounds ominous to me -- a little like "imposed community." I'm not % wild about the idea of communal meals (although a couple a week would be ok). % I value freedom, self-reliance, and frequent solitude as a means of spiritual % renewal. I don't want to be cheek to jowl with my neighbors, even neighbors % that I like. % % 2. Meetings. Don't like 'em at work, and there's no reason to think I'd like % them any better at my "home." The cohousing community that we're looking has % the raw land but there' s a lot of planning to be done to make the project % come to fruition. % That means lots of weekend meetings. With the demands of family and work, the % tiny islands of free time available on the weekend are a welcome sanctuary. % I'd hate to lose any of them. % % 3. Lack of space (see privacy above). We don't need 3,500 square feet but % 1400 sf (the average sized unit for the development being contemplated) is % smallish. Yes, I know, you don't need as much private space with the communal % space available, but still. . . .We're a family of four, five on the weekends, % and we need room to breathe. % % There are other , more personal concerns (e.g. length of commute) but those % are the primary ones. I take it they're not unique. I'd appreciate your % CANDID input because this is a major life change and I want to make sure we're % doing it with open eyes. % ----- John Sechrest . Helping people use PEAK - . computers and the Internet Public Electronic . more effectively Access to Knowledge,Inc . 850 SW 15th Street . Internet: sechrest [at] peak.org Corvallis Oregon 97331 . (541) 754-7325 . http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
-
concerns about cohousing Tonka444, March 22 1998
- Re: concerns about cohousing John Sechrest, March 22 1998
- RE: concerns about cohousing Rob Sandelin, March 22 1998
- Re: concerns about cohousing Matt Lawrence, March 22 1998
- Re: concerns about cohousing Barb Andre, March 23 1998
- Re: concerns about cohousing Jennifer McCoy, March 23 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.