|responding to queries||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lynn Nadeau (welcomeolympus.net)|
|Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:05:18 -0500|
Deb Behrens says she's "guilty" of responding to individuals, rather than the whole list. As a relative newcomer to the list, the individual response seems the appropriate one for most things, as it helps the person who asked for input, and doesn't take up the time and attention of hundreds of other people. I have responded individually to requests of the what-do-you-do type about legal structures, committee arrangements, participation requirements (or lack thereof), and other such matters. To the whole group I posted one query, regarding what different common houses do about second-floor access: the numerous responses I got were helpful in evolving our planning, but most people don't need the brand and model number of a wheelchair lift. Certain topics may be of such general relevance as to spark discussion and debate via these channels. If one is alert to such potential, there seems no reason to apologize for giving requested info just to the requester. Right? Or am I missing something? Lynn at RoseWind welcome [at] olympus.net
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.