|Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness (fwd)||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Fred H. Olson (fholsoncohousing.org)|
|Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 22:22:59 -0500|
Gail Curry curryg [at] unbc.ca is the author of the message below but due to a problem it was posted by the Fred the list manager: owner-cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- I think the key is the design of the community. Cohousing is designed to encourage community interaction (common house and common outdoor areas, houses close together, kitchens at front, street furniture, pedestrian streets, etc.); most single-family developments are not. (In fact, they tend to be designed to discourage community interaction.) Also, the need for a sense of community is the main reason people get involved in cohousing; this not the main reason people buy a single-family dwelling in a typical subdivision. So in cohousing, you have the essential ingredients for community: design to encourage interaction and people who want that interaction. This is not to say that one cannot improve the sense of community in a regular subdivision, but it would take a lot more conscious effort, and you would be fighting against an anti-interactive environment and people who just may not be interested in what you are trying to do. Gail Curry Prince George, British Columbia ---------- > From: Deb Smyre <dsmyre [at] primenet.com> > Subject: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Wednesday, May 13, 1998 9:36 AM > > I've been exchanging ideas with fellow grad students about my co-housing > project, and some questions have come up that I can't adequately answer > (i.e. I haven't been able to articulate a response, though I think I can > intuit the answers). > > One question is can't the benefits of co-housing be duplicated within any > single-family community via block-clubs, backyard barbeques, shared > child-care, co-op food buying, etc. The questions seem to revolve around > whether the old-fashioned approaches to achieving a sense of community > aren't just as effective as co-housing, without the hassle; or whether > co-housing isn't in some ways like the 'gated communities' developed in > wealthier suburbs to keep like-minded people in and others out. > > My intuition tells me the old-fashioned approach isn't adequate in most > urban neighborhoods because everyone's on the go with no time for > structured neighborhood 'togetherness' anymore. Beyond that, I'm seeking > help here in forming a more definitive response to such questions. > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Deb Smyre > E-Mail: dsmyre [at] primenet.com > Website: http://www.primenet.com/~dsmyre > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >
Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness (fwd) Fred H. Olson, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness (fwd) Catherine Harper, May 17 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.