|RE: I'm frustrated/LCD||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rich Lobdill (richardlsilcom.com)|
|Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 12:21:05 -0500|
Matt: Many times I have tried (sometimes successfully) to bite my tongue when we have focused on what I consider the financial 'Least Common Denominator' factor and I can share in your frustration. I think that living without amenities which you could have if everyone in your group had the same financial strength that you seem to have is one of the compromises of cohousing. In our case, we have had some charter members with many years of effort (and risk) come to the conclusion that as the prices continued their inevitable rise, they were simply not going to be able to qualify to buy their house. We solved that to some degree by building into our budget a fund for 'soft second' mortgages (of course, building it into the budget means that the common costs increase). This was only offered to those who had put some years of effort into the project. The soft second actually is a reduction in purchase price of the house and becomes a balloon loan which only gets paid back at the time in the future when the borrower sells her/his house. The interest on the loan is calculated by the difference in initial vs. subsequent selling price. So someone could borrow $10K and if they sell there house in 5 years for 20% more than they paid, the loan repayment would be $12K (paid to the homeowners association). It can certainly be looked at as a subsidy. In our case I feel it was a win/win. People who made the project happen were still able to afford to live there AND we could leave in some of the amenities (for instance we as a group were very committed to leaving our well appointed common house intact) which make the whole place special. Rich Lobdill Founding Member Tierra Nueva Cohousing. Oceano, CA -----Original Message----- Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 1998 8:41 PM Subject: I'm frustrated I'm really frustrated right now and, well, y'all get to listen to a bit of it. To me, Cohousing isn't about how cheaply I can live, it's about how well can I live. I had high hopes for a local cohousing group, but tonight they made a decision that I can't see an effective way to make work. There's a family of four who said they would join if they could have a house for $80K. Well, to get the cost down to that level (they are looking at a 4 bedroom), a lot of corners will have to be cut. The building materials will have to be cheap, the insulation will have to be reduced, the appliances will need to be less efficient and the common house will have to be scaled way back (assuming everybody pays an equal proportion). Forget about a nice swimming pool, a good workshop, a stable for horses (somebody wants a horse) and a number of other amenities. With that kind of target for a 4 bedroom house, I (as a single person) would be looking at a cost of less than $70K for a smaller house for myself. Why? My current house is appraised at over $130K and I could easily afford over $200K. I WANT to spend the extra money that a very energy efficient house will cost. I WANT to spend the money that a WONDERFUL common house will cost. I insist on spending the money for a really good workshop. I really like the idea of an Olympic size swimming pool. I don't think it's going to happen with this group. Sigh. I really want to live in cohousing, but, so far, I'm striking out. At the cohousing workshop here in Austin, I asked Chuck Durrett "What do I have to give up to live in cohousing". He didn't really have a good answer, his passions are different from mine. Please let me know your thoughts. -- Matt
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.