|UrbanIC's listserve and Cohousing-l||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Joani Blank (jeblankic.org)|
|Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 13:43:03 -0500|
[CC to cohousing-l readers: For those who don't know, UrbanICs (standing for urban intentional communities) is a listserve subscribed to by about 45 folks. Now that Michael Mariner, its initiator, is gone, they/we are considering the future of that list.] I think we need to be really clear that urban COHOUSING is only one subtype of contemporary urban community abuilding--or even desired--in these times. No one on this list will be surprised to hear that many folks into cohousing do not consider what they/we are doing to be "intentional community," because beyond the desire to be much closer to their neighbors than they ever previously imagined, they usually do not share political, religious, or even certain kinds of social ideology. In addition, many specifically want to distance themselves from what they imagine to be--or what truly is--the public image of intentional community. The other way that cohousing differs from other intentional communities is the large amount of privacy that is afforded to individual households in cohousing. This is also what makes it costs so much. Duh! In many cases, retrofitting a building or buildings as cohousing does not cost a lot less than new construction, and in some cases (Swan's Market in Oakland, for example), it costs a lot more. And this is what makes it out of reach for many who would love to live this way. So in deciding who the "market" for these two lists might be, and whether there is a need for both, I think we need to try to "cut the pie" a couple of different ways and see what falls out. As soon as several households are sharing one kitchen (other than a separate common kitchen shared for a few meals a week) the community ceases to be cohousing. I think we have three groups of people out there in the world. There are people who want to live in cohousing and can afford it, there are people who prefer to live with less privacy and more intimacy and more shared ideology, and there is a third group who'd prefer cohousing but can't afford it. Then there are subgroups in each of these groups that want to live in urban areas, and although I daresay that every individual has his or her personal reasons for wanting to live in an urban setting, my guess is that most of us share the desire to 1) be a part of revitalizing a declining neighborhood, 2) reduce our reliance on the automobile, 3) be close to "everything." I guess that I would like to see urbanIC list continue, but as a person whose focus is on urban cohousing in particular, I expect that I and others like me will continue to use coho-l as our main discussion group, because so far, anything from this list of import to the cohousing virtual community has also showed up on coho-l. And on that list I'm not particularly interested in reading about non-cohousing urban communities. Well....I'm interested and supportive. It's just not a priority of mine. Joani Blank Doyle Street Cohousing (pretty darned urban cohousing where I live now), and Swan's Market Cohousing (in downtown Oakland ,where I will be living in a year and which will be the most urban cohousing in N. America).
- UrbanIC's listserve and Cohousing-l Joani Blank, October 6 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.