RE: Native Plants | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 10:25:01 -0600 |
My, how this topic spreads. I am on another list server where the "Native plant natzis" are duking it out with the "genetically dysfunctional ornamentalists" The word "required" is interesting. Why would such a thing be required, and by whom? I would suspect that a well placed native plant would need little if any watering once it was established, which might be the key? Landscapes can be the occaision for lots and lots of fun work if you enjoy such work. However, if you do not, then careful placements of the right plants in the right places will save you lots and lots of work later. Not to mention water. Native plants, should need no watering except when first being placed. This is what my wife does for a living, create really attractive landscapes that are low to no maintenance. It requires a great deal of plant knowlege to accomplish this. She uses a lot of natives but does not limit her pallete to only natives. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Where the landscape blends nicely between natives and ornamentals and its hard to tell sometimes which are which. (thanks to the talented landscape crew we have)
-
Native Plants Jason Whitfield, November 24 1998
- Re: Native Plants Stevenson/Bitner, November 24 1998
- Re: Native Plants Dahako, November 25 1998
- RE: Native Plants Rob Sandelin, November 26 1998
- Re: Native Plants Claire Elliott, November 26 1998
- Re: Native Plants Jason Whitfield, November 26 1998
- Native Plants Sharon Villines, November 29 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.