Re: Habitat for Humanity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H. Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:16:04 -0600 |
Scott Crowley scowley [at] alex.lib.utah.edu is the author of the message below but due to a problem it was posted by the Fred the list manager: owner-cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- Habitat for Humanity is an odd cat. Each state has a separate organization, with accomplishments varying wildly. Here in Utah it is closely allied with the archdiocese of Salt Lake. They build only a couple of houses a year. All the materials and land are donated. One of the biggest problems they face is in getting the new homeowners to follow through on the commitment they make of X (500 ?) hours of labor toward the next house. Suddenly, the previous renter with a couple of jobs and kids finds him/herself with house payments to make. This is where cohousing seems to make a huge amount of sense. Supportive (though nondenomenational) community. The new homeowner could leave kids with neighbors while s/he goes over to help the next house get built. I don't know why our local Habitat has been so unresponsive except for the fact that our project isn't a roman catholic project.
-
Re: Habitat for Humanity Fred H. Olson, December 2 1998
-
RE: Habitat for Humanity Lashbrook, Stephan, March 8 2001
-
Re: Habitat for Humanity Denise Meier, March 8 2001
- Re: Habitat for Humanity Denise Meier, March 8 2001
- private vs. public space juliemazo, March 11 2001
-
Re: Habitat for Humanity Denise Meier, March 8 2001
-
RE: Habitat for Humanity Lashbrook, Stephan, March 8 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.