|RE: Waiting Lists and Approval of New Owners||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousemail.msn.com)|
|Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 09:44:26 -0600|
The lack of ability to pick members is a potential weak link in the cohousing concept. Thus far only one cohousing group has been so dilluted with non-community people that it is reverting to a non-community state. Most groups so far have been able to find people who are attracted to the community aspects, not just the real estate. But this is something, as a whole, to watch out for in the movement. The banks screen people for economic fitness, but economic fitness is only aspect of cohousing. It just takes one really dysfunctional person in a group to wound it seriously. Communities that screen their members carefully, usually with some sort of trial member process, do so because they know how fragile community can be, and how easy it is to break. One example of a problem cohousing groups may face in the future is when cohousing is built exclusively as low income housing. If the folks come because its affordable, not because it is cohousing or community, that lack of interest in the community will end up killing it. Common Ground Cohousing in Aspen is apparently having this problem. And cohousing without any sense of community is just a condo with an oversized meeting room. It's the community that separates Cohousing from the condos down the street. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
- Waiting Lists and Approval of New Owners Sharon Villines, December 28 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.