|Re: Consensus Fallbacks||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Stevenson/Bitner (lilbertconcentric.net)|
|Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:10:09 -0600|
I stand corrected, then! Perhaps this is one of those "you had to be there" things. I still can't imagine why anyone would want or need a gun in their house, so much so that they would leave cohousing, but that's another discussion. Thanks for taking the time to explain the situation. On the subject of revisiting issues with new members- I believe that our group had a policy in place that worked. When I joined, we had not moved in yet, and the rule was something like there had to be a two-thirds majority vote in favor of revisiting an issue before it could be discussed again. This removed the old/new member issue, while insuring that issues that had strong aggreement in the past would not be brought up again easily or often. Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.