|Re: Commonhouse dining room tables||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lynn Nadeau (welcomeolympus.net)|
|Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:56:30 -0500|
I recently spent a week at a boarding school, with dining for about 70, and I was struck that their tables were perfect for common house. They were 3 ft x 5 ft, which allows 6 seated comfortably, and just room for serving dishes etc in the center, and everyone can talk with anyone else at the table easily. Furthermore, this is a dimension which can be bought in the conventional folding-table type. They used an attractive oilcloth covering that looked cheerful and washed up easily. My observation is that round tables-- for all the aesthetics of roundness-- create a wasted space in the center, and quickly become too big to talk with any but one's immediate neighbors. Drop leaves sound cool, until you start scraping food out of the cracks. The rectangular tables at the school I visited were set diagonally to the room, which made them look less institutional. Of course it would be pleasant to have some tables for two or four, as well, for variety. We figure to have some tables that don't fold, but just get moved aside when the center is needed, plus some folding tables that slide into a storage area, for occasions when we have more diners. Similarly, with chairs. Lynn at RoseWind
Commonhouse dining room tables Sharon Villines, July 27 1999
- Re: Commonhouse dining room tables Lynn Nadeau, July 27 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.