Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Deb Smyre (dsmyre![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 17:39:57 -0600 (MDT) |
I've noticed the term "poly people" is being used as a term of being rather than doing, i.e. "we are poly people" rather than "we are people who have chosen to be poly". This is interesting since it fits directly with someone's earlier suggestion that it's okay to be openly prejudiced against "poly people" as opposed to, say, gay people. I view polyamory as simply a lifestyle choice, not a congenital trait or an ethnicity, and I don't believe disapproval of a lifestyle choice is in the same social category as hating someone for being brown or gay. That is to say, it's not an individual's choice to be brown or gay, but it's a choice to be poly. Creating a vocabulary that uses "poly people" as a state of being rather than a state of doing makes prejudice seem a reasonable accusation when disapproval is expressed. Also, this labeling gives "poly people" a single group identity, which is comforting and supports a "We v.s. Them" response to criticism. Arguing 'they don't like us for who we are' holds more sway than arguing 'they don't like what we're doing'. I think gay couples who are commited to a single partner for a long-term relationship and/or child-rearing are great neighbors. I don't feel the same way about people who choose to be polyamorous. Maybe it's my age (44), though I think I'm a fairly open-minded person with regard to human sexuality. Luckily, I've had only positive sexual experiences in my history (sorry, Catherine). When I think of polyamory, I think of people "sleeping around" with a fancy name attached to their behavior. This, in my humble opinion, clashes so with what partnering and commitment is supposed to be about -- with what I'm about at this stage in life -- that I honestly don't care to be around folks who are into it. I think polyamory has become more visible with the help of the internet, not necessarily more popular. My belief is that it's always been with us by different names like "swinging", and it's always been primarily a male-driven lifestyle. I believe the Women's Movement and a variety of virulent STDs which shall remain nameless have seriously curbed the appeal of polyamory for most folks. Rob wrote that it took a while for some people to own up to their disapproval of community members who were engaged in "partner swapping". Maybe I'm a half-step ahead by already publicly owning up. ==================================================== Deb Smyre, MSW, LGSW http://www.primenet.com/~dsmyre ====================================================
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING, (continued)
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Fred H. Olson, October 19 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Stuart Staniford-Chen, October 19 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Unnat, October 19 1999
- RE: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Rob Sandelin, October 20 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Deb Smyre, October 20 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Lee Irwin, October 20 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Hans Tilstra, October 21 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Michael McIntyre, October 21 1999
- Re: ROMANTICIZING COHOUSING Maggi Rohde, October 21 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.