|Work Requirements: LCD?||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: DCS (cdmemployees.org)|
|Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:01:59 -0700 (MST)|
My question is sort of related to the recent thread about residents who are unable to participate in community work paying to have it done. We are looking at a capital improvements plan and its accompanying budget, and we are struggling with balancing the basic needs of our neighborhood (e.g., paying the water bill) with the desire for capital projects (like a workshop) and the inability of some members to pay higher dues. We've discussed income sharing in the sense that the more affluent members could pay into some account to cover the shortfalls of those residents who can't pay an increased dues. We've also discussed counting sweat equity towards payment of dues for households that are comparatively economically disadvantaged, but then what about the households that are able to pay but also put in tremendous amounts of sweat equity? Are we valuing their input less? Are we creating a class of less-affluent cohousing serfs? I am tending to lean towards we just don't do anything that the whole group can't afford (lowest common denominator.) Any thoughts? Christine Della Maggiora Eno Commons Cohousing Durham, NC http://www.employees.org/~enoweb/
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.