|Correction-Open Letter to Chuck and Katie||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: allenbutcher (allenbutcherjuno.com)|
|Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:25:59 -0700 (MST)|
Katie, Chuck and the CoHousing List: Please excuse me, I must correct a misstatement in my recent message. (Sorry that this is off topic for the cohousing list, yet I would be seriously remiss in letting this go.) In my "Open Letter to Katie and Chuck" I stated that, "I ... consider Henry (Hammer) to be the second most influential person in the development of Twin Oaks." I meant the second most influential MEMBER, after a co-founder, Kathleen Kinkade. The implication of my statement in the context of my letter is that B. F. Skinner would be the most influential person, but that was certainly not my meaning. As the person who inspired Twin Oaks, I consider Skinner to be in another class. Even though Skinner visited Twin Oaks, he never joined. When asked "why not" he stated that it was because his wife dissented. I suspect that the truth, however, was that B. F. Skinner was an academic communitarian, concerned about jeopardizing his credentials were he to join a counter-cultural community inspired by his work, especially since it had already by that time diverged from his original ideas. His wife's concerns, we may postulate, may have had to do more with lifestyle and standard of living. Surely, however, Twin Oaks is the better for his non-participation anyway, since his ideas would have likely been much harder to transcend had he been a member. According to my values structure, it is certainly commendable that the founders of the cohousing community movement should choose to live in a community inspired by their work. It would be interesting to speculate how the cohousing movement would be different today had you, Chuck and Katie, chosen to be merely academic communitarians! Allen
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.