Non Participating Households | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Victoria (victoria![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:19:00 -0600 (MDT) |
We are currently talking about doing this to help with issues of unfairness around volunteerism: Currently our 'condo fees' are artificially low because we do a lot of the work ourselves. If we hired out all the work, the fees would be higher. So we propose (1) figuring out what the higher rate would be without our sweat equity (2) set the 'condo fees' to that higher rate (3) if we've contributed around 10 hours or more during a particular month then we get a 'rebate', and pay the former fee rather than the new higher fee. This is up to each individual's conscience, and would not be policed, though of course our financial records are public. This is a controversial notion and it will be interesting to see if it passes muster. I for one like it much better than charging extra for those who don't volunteer. It seems hard for an individual to decide to volunteer extra fees, while working with your conscience when writing out that monthly check seems do-able. Vicky Leary Trillium Hollow Portland, OR
- Re: Non Participating Households, (continued)
- Re: Non Participating Households Cheryl Charis-Graves, July 31 2000
- Re: Non Participating Households lilbert, July 31 2000
- Re: Non Participating Households Jim King, July 31 2000
- Re: Non Participating Households Judy Baxter, August 1 2000
- Non Participating Households Victoria, August 1 2000
- Re: Non Participating Households lilbert, August 1 2000
- Re: Non Participating Households Kay Argyle, August 3 2000
- RE: Non Participating Households Rob Sandelin, August 5 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.