Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli&John (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:21:01 -0600 (MDT) |
** Reply to note from "Hans Tilstra" <tilstra [at] smartchat.net.au> Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:04:45 +1000 >From Racheli Sonora cohousing, Tucson. Hans wrote (in part): > McCamant & Durrett's book seemed more intended to design the traffic flow > for daily "how are you" and "who's cooking tonight?", rather than terse > debates about whether or not common funding should go to spa pools. Except that "who's cooking tonight?" might turn out to hide a whole slew of issues which need to be worked out... As for my short experience of in-cohousing living (since last July, with most members moving in later on): So far, the level of stress for me has been exceedingly high. I hope that this is because we are still trying to put in place various rules and structures, in addition to learning how to live near/with each other, and that the level of stress will go down. (Would it?)... R. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live Elizabeth Stevenson, April 10 2001
- Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live Racheli&John, April 11 2001
- Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live Sharon Villines, April 11 2001
-
Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live Elizabeth Stevenson, April 11 2001
- Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live Denise Meier, April 11 2001
- Re: Cohousing as a rigorous way to live JoycePlath, April 12 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.