|Re:quorum||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Peter Scott (psak.planet.gen.nz)|
|Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:31:01 -0600 (MDT)|
When we first wrote our legal docs we chose 25% for a quorum, on the advice of a long time meeting goer. This is 25% of *people* who are least assoc member or above. Who ever is there makes the decsion. Anyone who was not present and objects has the right to reopen the decision at the next meeting only. This has worked fine, and if the quorum had ever been higher a good percentage of meetings would have been cancelled i am sure. I dont know what would happen if the consequences of a decsion kicked in in between those two weeks, to be honest i dont ever recall it actually happening. Maybe that means decsions are never as urgent as they seem, or that we just plan well ahead! Or maybe we just make good decsions ;-) -- Regards, Peter Scott Auckland New Zealand Phone +64 9 832 4004 / 025 6240154 * Earthsong Eco-Neighbourhood <http://www.ecohousing.pl.net/> * EcoVillage Association NZ <http://www.converge.org.nz/evcnz/> _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
Re:quorum Lynn Nadeau, June 1 2001
- Re:quorum Peter Scott, June 2 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.