RE: "have kids" "have nots" fighting over site
From: Racheli&John (
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:59:01 -0600 (MDT)
** Reply to note from "Rowenahc" <rowenahc [at]> Sat, 9 Jun 2001 
16:44:44 -0400
>From Racheli

The following is the exact description of what happened with
us (Sonora Cohousing, Tucson), too:  Even though we 
were an urban infill project, the choice of a specific site
caused a few households to drop out.

> One reason I moved over the CCH was that I wanted to be close to the City
> and so did all the others who joined - we built commitment to the City into
> our vision statement.   It meant that we had to compromise on space and
> particular location but at least geography was not a major issue.   Even so,
> when we finally settled on our small site in a "transitional" neighborhood
> we lost some people.  I think that is bound to happen when you start the
> group without a site.

Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at]  Unsubscribe  and other info:

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.