Re: Associate Members | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 15:55:01 -0600 (MDT) |
At RoseWind in Port Townsend WA we have two different related situations: Neighbor Family bought the land across the street from us, with an upfront interest in associating themselves with our project. Money was not a problem for them, and they had not only a strong interest but brought many relevant skills. And are great people! After some debate and working out, we made a contract with them, referring to it as an Exchange Membership (don't know why). The essence of it is that in all ways but those related to their private land, they are full members. They paid a "common house share" of $10,000 (analogous to the part of members' buy-in money that went for that purpose) and designated a couple of walking trail easements on their property. Split the legal costs of setting up the contract. They participate (and pay assessments) equally with the "regular" members. Nobody even thinks of them as a different sort of member, in our daily lives. If they sell their property, the new owners may become members if they renew the contract, but are not obliged to do so. This was a unique situation, and we dealt with it as such. ----------------------------------- Other than that, we have several de-facto social members, who are regularly at meals, work parties, and socials. One was a live-in partner with a member for a year or two, and then has spent a couple of years as a guest, house sitter, and renter at our various homes. He has volunteered A LOT. The other is the middle aged son of an elder member, and he lives a few houses away. He also has been very helpful to the group and individuals here. They have no named status, nor official privileges. We just all tacitly agree that they are welcome. This last year we have had unexpected legal bills that caused us to look around for sources of money. Several people thought "sell Associate Memberships." But that would be no goose laying golden eggs. It's an exchange, and the trade-offs merit attention. People who are already using some of our facilities wouldn't think it very neighborly of us to tell them they had to either play frisbee elsewhere than our field or pay us something. It would probably also make it so that our insurance wouldn't cover them if they got hurt doing so, making liability suits more of a possibility. Spell out just what you are offering. Full privileges would entail more people wanting garden plots, more people having parties in the common house, their friends and family members at events. This could be fine, but be sure you have room. Would privileges offered be permanent, or for a set period of time, renewable/revocable? Does that put us in a sort of class system, We judging if They are still "worth it"? To designated individual(s) only, or can they, like the rest of us, assume their friends and family are welcome? (We had a neighbor we once came close to offering honorary membership for good reasons. She later took an alcoholic, abusive, violent husband who came with a large number of alcoholic relatives and buddies and their many rowdy children, who simply overran her home and the streets around it. Had they overrun the common house, we would have coped, but I'm glad we didn't have to.) Do they participate in decision making? Do they pay full assessments, or a token fee? Welcome at business meetings? discussion circles? sharing circles? Or are they really not equal members? One could require WORK, rather than, or in addition to, money. Around here we need work more than we need money. One could require nothing, and bestow privileges or some named status out of some human motive (neigborliness, recognition of great service to the community, or of social affection). One could require blood relationship, or residence here, albeit as a non-owner, for x time, as in the case of a perennial renter, ex-domestic-partner/spouse, or housemate. In any event, it seems complicated to us. I look forward to hearing what others do. Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.rosewind.org http://www.ptguide.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Associate Members Lynn Nadeau, July 8 2001
-
Associate Members Judy Hecht, September 13 2005
- Unit Choice [was Associate Members] Sharon Villines, September 13 2005
-
Associate members Jan Kenney, May 5 2015
- Re: Associate members Jerry McIntire, May 6 2015
-
Associate Members Judy Hecht, September 13 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.