Re: Revisiting Decisions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:00:02 -0700 (MST) |
> Our group made the following decison about changing decisions: > > 11/19/2000 Changing Decisions 75% of the equity membership would > need to agree before re-visiting a consensed decision. Interesting question -- where does consensus begin and end. If a test of how well your consensus process if working is that decisions stay made until there is new information or changed circumstances, was the decision ever made by consensus if 25% of the group can be ignored if they request to revisit the decision. That sounds like 75% is good enough, leaving 25% unheaded. I realize this is a serious issue. I'm not finding fault with the difficulty of never moving forward, and needed a fall back position if a large majority of the group is in agreement, but should this fall back position also be called "consensus" or referred to in the same terms. Defining 75% is vote counting with majority rule. Sharon -- In Washington DC where all roads lead to Casablanca _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: revisiting decisions, (continued)
- RE: revisiting decisions Rob Sandelin (Exchange), May 20 1996
- Revisiting Decisions Joani Blank, May 21 1996
-
Revisiting Decisions Gary Kent, December 4 2001
-
Re: Revisiting Decisions Diane Simpson, December 6 2001
- Re: Revisiting Decisions Sharon Villines, December 7 2001
- RE: Revisiting Decisions Jeanne Goodman, December 7 2001
-
Re: Revisiting Decisions Diane Simpson, December 6 2001
-
RE: Revisiting Decisions Racheli&John, December 7 2001
- Re: Revisiting Decisions Elizabeth Stevenson, December 7 2001
- Re: Revisiting Decisions Jeanne Goodman, December 7 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.