|Re: Revisiting Decisions||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddessattbi.com)|
|Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:32:01 -0700 (MST)|
In practice, I think the number of people required to revisit a decision is very different, depending on whether the community is built or not. We had the somewhat draconian number of 2/3 to revisit(I think) before we moved in. It was absolutely necessary with turnover of members that they understand that each new member would not be able to change all the previous decisions, especially for a group that had the trials and tribulations that ours did. That said, I don't think we've ever even had to fall back on that rule since we moved in. When there is sentiment toward making any decision, it gets brought up at a meeting. So many of our decisions are time-limited anyway. At this stage, most of our decisions are about things that need fairly regular revisiting, like the budget. Most decisions seem to only last from a quarter to a year. Contrast that with having to decide which architect to get or purchasing land, and you have a very different process, requiring different rules. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento California tamgoddess [at] attbi.com > From: Racheli&John <jnpalme [at] attglobal.net> > Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:36:30 MST > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: RE: [C-L]_Revisiting Decisions > > ** Reply to note from "Jeanne Goodman" <goodmanj [at] jpcohousing.org> Fri, 7 > Dec > 2001 16:32:04 -0500 > > From Racheli > Sonora Cohousing > > 75% for revisiting decisions seems awfully high to me, too. > In our community, we require that 5 members (out of 36 > households) ask to re-open a consensed-on decision. If it was > up to me only, I'd have the number even lower. > I think it's important to remember that agreeing to discuss > an issue once again isn't the same as agreeing to change the > decision - all it says, really, is that some people are unhappy > about a decision, and more discussion is necessary. Perhaps > the decision will change, and perhaps not. But not agreeing > to talk about it unless you have such a huge majority is > something I'd be very uncomfortable with (and which, to > me, seems somehow contrary to the spirit of consensus). > > R. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Revisiting Decisions, (continued)
- Re: Revisiting Decisions Elizabeth Stevenson, December 7 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.