|Re: blocking consensus||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Sara A. (mabonwymindspring.com)|
|Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:30:01 -0700 (MST)|
At 08:15 PM 2/1/02, you wrote:
I've been told repeatedly that the only justification for blocking consensus is that you think the proposal will harm the community, and not because you dislike it personally.
Hmmm. I think that if something's serious enough that you would consider moving, then it's serious enough to warrant blocking.
The whole point of consensus is that it preserves the integrity of the group and values both the group as a whole and each individual therein. Placing restrictions on blocking such that someone's deep conviction that they do NOT want to do something...and can't see a workable compromise....is not likely to achieve that goal.
Is standing aside an option? Can you opt out, ie, "I don't want to do this, and I'm not going to, but I won't stop other people from doing it"
People place restrictions on blocking consensus because they envision people using it all the time and causing problems. But in reality, blocking is scary and is not something that most people will do in a group of their friends and neighbors unless they REALLY REALLY object to whatever it is.
Sara _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: common house meal preparation?, (continued)
- Re: common house meal preparation? Howard Landman, January 29 2002
blocking consensus Kay Argyle, February 1 2002
- Re: blocking consensus Sara A., February 1 2002
- Re: blocking consensus Tree Bressen, February 1 2002
- Re: blocking consensus Michael D, February 1 2002
- Re: blocking consensus Sharon Villines, February 1 2002
- Sociocracy (response to "blocking consensus" and long) Sheila Braun, February 2 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.