|Criteria for setting meeting agendas||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Becky Schaller (bschallertheriver.com)|
|Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:33:14 -0600 (MDT)|
Would people be willing to say what are the criteria that you use for setting agendas for meetings? We have a parking lot of issue and some of these issues have been in the parking lot for many months. Clearly, this is discouraging many people. These are issues that can wait. And they do. What is also frustrating to people is that some people wait and wait patiently for issues which are important to them to come to the general meetings. Then someone else proposes an issue which needs immediate attention. So then the parking lot issues have to wait even longer. For example, right now we have 13 issues in our parking lot. Probably about 6 of them could be combined into one big issue about funding items that people would like for the community to purchase. But other items have been in the parking lot for close to six months. This is demoralizing for people. Do other groups have a way of deciding which issues should come to the attention of the upcoming meeting? Becky Schaller Sonora Cohousing Tucson, Arizona _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.