Re: common house tensions to resolve-this got long | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Becky Schaller (bschallertheriver.com) | |
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 17:55:10 -0600 (MDT) |
Elizabeth, would you say more about this. In our community this is a conversation we have started, but not yet finished. When you say you would block consensus, do you only mean outside people coming in to use the common house for commmercial purposes? Do you include people in the community using the common house for their own commercial purposes? Do you include Tupperware Parties? I would appreciate any clarification you can give to us. Thanks, Becky Schaller Sonora Cohousing Tucson, Arizona > Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:22:51 -0700 > Subject: Re: [C-L]_common house tensions to resolve-this got long > From: Elizabeth Stevenson <tamgoddess [at] attbi.com> > Yup. I personally would block consensus if someone wanted to use the CH for > commercial purposes. It's not worth it. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: common house tensions to resolve-this got long Becky Schaller, June 16 2002
-
Re: common house tensions to resolve-this got long Elizabeth Stevenson, June 17 2002
-
Diversity??? Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, June 17 2002
- Re: Diversity??? Howard Landman, June 18 2002
- Re: Diversity??? Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, June 18 2002
-
Diversity??? Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, June 17 2002
-
Re: common house tensions to resolve-this got long Elizabeth Stevenson, June 17 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.