individual versus group- systems ecology perspective | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: mark a demaio (mdemaiojuno.com) | |
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:57:03 -0700 (MST) |
Wow! The listserv has been very hot and emotionally charged lately. As a chronic lurker to the list and right brain type, I?ve wanted to respond to this for some time, but had some fear of being flamed too much by all the heat, not being the most eloquent around. Anyway, here?s a log if anyone is interested! In grad school systems ecology class (a mix between industrial systems engineering and natural ecology), I remembered our youngest professor challenging us to find examples of selfless community behavior and synergies where "group selection" of the trait occurred. Idealistic youngsters that we were, we thought they would abound. Predator prey relationships- I think not. Ants farming aphids- there is little benefit to the enslaved organisms. Mycorihiza on tree roots ?we might have a winner here, but alas- both fungi and trees evolve seperately to take greater advantage of what the other provides, but must develop feedback mechanisms so that they don?t get destroyed by the other. Herding mechanism among animals serve to have an individually protective mechanism from a predator, who has also been the product of individual selection in the ability to peel Saturday night supper off from the pack. Oh wait, we have one, what about the bees that die for the sake of the queen when cold arrives? Nope sorry, they are merely all genetic clones, such that a beehive might actually be characterized as an individual more than separate bees. And I recall after that class how upset I was of a likely error in my perceptions that a mechanism existed to how the good in the world could grow by humankind evolving en masse to the point that selfless synergies and community could further develop. apparently Darwin was in the way. I kept trying to think up an example of genetic evolution of synergy or "group selection", but couldn?t find one that couldn?t be shot down. But the bottom line is, interestingly, hereditary propensity for grouping and synergy is an individually selected thing. Only recently have I thought of it from an "it?s all good" perspective. That we have the power of the genetic selection on the side of the community movement, at the individual level. Thus group evolution and growth is really co-evolution among various individuals. Interestingly, genetic selection operates at the individual level. Ecologically speaking, synergy and groups only exists and develops when it benefits the individual. When successful individuals harvest the fruits of synergies, they become more effective competitively only to the point that the individual becomes more successful and the successful trait/gene may appear to be selected for in a population, but is merely passed on by the individual. Groups and associations tend to not exist where they do not have some superior benefit to the individual. So maybe when we concede for the benefit of the group, we are really conceding for the benefits the group provides us individually. As I really do believe that groups exists for the benefit of the individuals and would not or should not even be an entity without them. Then there was my psych professor who clearly showed that heredity predisposes potential, while the environment is what molds that potential. So without the continuim of community socially being passed down from generation to generation, the relatively (compared to environment) mild hereditary effects of predisposition to community don?t get unleashed. It?s truly amazing how a culture can be segwayed (breaking the information chain) for a generation or two of "nuclear family" to the point that it becomes dysfunctional at other levels of community. Unfortunately, most of our community skills are learned skills among humans and not instincts. So in some ways one could argue that the community movement is as important in protecting and largely reinventing a nearly devastated social legacy of interconnectedness in the american version of western society. Almost as important as regulating cloning and protecting species diversity is to protecting our highest information source, genetic information. Mark DeMaio, PE, Concord (CA) Oasis Ecohousing Seeking future owners for a new straw bale flexible floor plan home. 925-687-2560(message), 530-694-9501(weekday eves), concord [at] Ecohousing.org www.Ecohousing.org http://communities.msn.com/ecohouse newspaper article(s): http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/29/HO110081.DTL whose divorced parents are tickled pink about living in 50+ gated communities, even though I?ve tried to, as the CSN song states "teach, your parents well". If only there was a 50+ cohousing-like community I could show them?.. ________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.