Re: Control freaks and groups | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:08:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> It works wonders for > cooperative process once control freaks figure out they can't hijack the > process anymore, and this changes their behaviors. Labeling people "control freaks" is really making me uncomfortable. Could we discuss this in other terms -- like how do you deal with a person who objects to all decisions made in her absence or who continues to argue a point when other group members want to move on? How do group members make a decision that professional process intervention is necessary when one person objects? "Hijack" the process? What does this really mean? Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Subject: Re: [C-L]_Dealing with difficult personalities don i arkin, April 22 2003
-
Re: Subject: Re: [C-L]_Dealing with difficult personalities Juva DuBoise, April 23 2003
-
Control freaks and groups Rob Sandelin, April 23 2003
- Re: Control freaks and groups Sharon Villines, April 23 2003
- Hijacking the process Rob Sandelin, April 24 2003
-
Control freaks and groups Rob Sandelin, April 23 2003
-
Re: Subject: Re: [C-L]_Dealing with difficult personalities Elizabeth Stevenson, April 23 2003
- Fixing the Mentally Ill! mdutton, April 23 2003
- Re: Fixing the Mentally Ill! Elizabeth Stevenson, April 23 2003
-
Re: Subject: Re: [C-L]_Dealing with difficult personalities Juva DuBoise, April 23 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.