Re: Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than> consensus?] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Matt Lawrence (matttechnoronin.com) | |
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:53:11 -0600 (MDT) |
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Becky Schaller wrote: > I wish I knew more about Robert's Rules of Order, but I think a person can > introduce a motion during a meeting. I have to admit though, I'm not sure > about this. I've spent most of my life learning about consensus, so my > knowledge of voting procedures is more limited. With two people who are expert on Robert's Rules of Order, it's easy to whipsaw a meeting to get just about any outcome they want. You probably don't want to get too deeply into them, I think they are far more useful for destroying consensus than reaching it. And, yes, I do know Robert's Rules fairly well, I just refuse to use them to railroad things through a meeting. -- Matt -- >From my heart and from my hand, why don't people understand my intention? _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than> consensus?] Becky Schaller, August 9 2003
- Re: Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than> consensus?] Matt Lawrence, August 9 2003
- Re: Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than> consensus?] Sharon Villines, August 9 2003
- Re: Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than> consensus?] Sharon Villines, August 9 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.