RE: Consensus [Was new article on blocking] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: TR Ruddick (truddickearthlink.net) | |
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:03:39 -0700 (MST) |
> From: "Mary English" <Mary.English [at] hsc.utah.edu> > Subject: [C-L]_ Re: Consensus > Sharon, > Thank you for a well written informative email on consensus. More than once, I have wished to comment on what I saw > happening in a consensus process, and could not find a way to describe my concern or objection about the way it was > being carried forward. You write with great clarity about it. I agree. When people talk about "blocking consensus" as if it's something wrong, I suspect we have assemblies that are deeply entrenched in "groupthink"--the potentially fatal notion that the group has to agree on everything and any individual who doesn't is a dangerous deviant. Symptoms of groupthink include: making big, costly decisions rapidly, but spending hours picking through the details; intolerance for minority opinion; the kinds of "why, then, are you here" comments that Mary noted. Overall, there are lots of people who promote one decision-making process over another. Research shows that groups that structure their decision-making come up with better decisions. However, provided that the process works via consensus or some other method of acknowledging the rights of the minority, there doesn't seem to be one way of structuring the process that works best in all situations. Individual group characteristics need to be considered. Also, the most important group factor in decision-making quality is the quality of knowledge in the group, and whether it's recognized and valued. Reading Tree's article, I found myself imagining a group making a decision about HVAC in the common house and ignoring the objections of one member whose "block" was not supported by anyone, despite the fact that she's a certified HVAC technician. It sounds ridiculous until you think about groups you were in where personality conflicts were permitted to rule over expertise (pause now to reflect on the current White House inner circle). T R _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Consensus [Was new article on blocking] Sharon Villines, January 21 2004
-
Re: Consensus [Was new article on blocking] Eris Weaver, January 21 2004
- Re: Consensus [Was new article on blocking] Sharon Villines, January 21 2004
- RE: Consensus [Was new article on blocking] TR Ruddick, January 21 2004
-
Re: Consensus [Was new article on blocking] Eris Weaver, January 21 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.