Re: committee effectiveness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT) |
RoseWind Cohousing, Port Townsend WA. In our 15 years, we have evolved from just enough members that we all did everything, to now where we have committees for Grounds, Common House Operations, Finance, Facilitation, Steering, plus smaller committees for Outreach, Kidstuff, Architectural Review, plus various Task Forces for specific projects. We have struggled with "empowering the committees". It has at times been portrayed as an issue of trust - can't we just trust the committee to make decisions we'll all support? A reality check kicks in: sometimes committees and task forces lose members and end up with 1-3 people on the team. Can such low numbers really represent 24 families accurately? Maybe more significantly, different sorts of people volunteer for different committees. The Grounds team, that runs the mowers and digs the irrigation ditches, represents a different segment of the membership than does the Facilitation team, or the Finance team. Just because there are 4 people on a volunteer committee does not in any way assure that a full spectrum of points of view will be represented in that subgroup. So we'd "trust a committee", they'd put in lots of time and energy, and bring to the group for approval something that a number of people had big concerns about. Hurt feelings and stuck process sometimes ensued. We learned (are still learning) that it's important to balance committee autonomy with clarity about what the team's mandate is. Are they being asked to just-do-it? Or research the options and bring a recommendation or two to the group? Or just-do-it as long as it doesn't cost more than $42 and satisfies the concerns of George and Susan? Or have the right to decide, but first have a discussion circle to get input from people and do their best to incorporate that input? Early checking, via a discussion circle for example, and/or email, can prevent a team from investing so much energy in something that their feelings are hurt if it doesn't fly. If they need to make adjustments, they can do so early, rather than later. Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.rosewind.org http://www.ptguide.com http://www.ptforpeace.info (very active peace movement here- see our photo)
- Re: committee effectiveness, (continued)
- Re: committee effectiveness Tree Bressen, September 21 2004
-
RE: committee effectiveness Douglas G. Larson, September 21 2004
- Re: RE: committee effectiveness Sharon Villines, September 21 2004
- RE: RE: committee effectiveness Rob Sandelin, September 21 2004
- Re: committee effectiveness Lynn Nadeau, September 21 2004
- Re: Re: committee effectiveness Sharon Villines, September 21 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.