|HOA as distributor||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Eileen McCourt (emccourtcharter.net)|
|Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:30:08 -0800 (PST)|
I live at Oak Creek Commons with Norm, and have a different perspective on the cable TV/internet contract we have signed. This email is not to re-engage Norm on the subject; we have debated this to the utter exhaustion of our community on our email group. I am sending it to provide an example of what a creative way to leverage the buying power of the HOA with little downside risk, though this particular deal happens because of a confluence of our needs for service with the desire of the service provider to buy market share. We just happen to be in the right place at the right time. We have 36 households. The service provider has offered us a 58% discount on bundled services if we can deliver 30 households as a single billing entity. 26 have signed for cable TV and broadband cable internet, 4 have signed for the internet service only; these 4 are paying a $5 differential for the internet service (based on what Charter offered for internet only for 30 households). The bundled service is $40/mo, the high speed internet is $25/mo. The buying group of 30 is paying for the 4 cable TV services that are not allocated. 30 households have signed 5 year agreements with the HOA, agreeing to pay for their services for that period of time. While this may not be binding in a court of law, it's good enough between neighbors, in my view. All 36 households share the $40/mo for the common house. All installation fees have been waived by Charter. We also have the option to go down to 28 households, based on future home sales that may result in someone dropping out. This deal will pay for itself in 27 months, even if we have to buy out the entire contract for the remainder of the term of 60 months. The company, Charter Communications, is buying market share; the deal does not really buy them anything else, since over 50% of our community was already buying internet and/or TV services from them at retail prices. Charter is partly owned by Paul Allen, and we all know the impact of Microsoft's early purchase of market share when they were going against IBM. Charter's long term strategy requires getting the wires to the homes, so they can start delivering telephone, cable TV, HDTV and internet services through the same cable. By the way, this contract comes after a 3 month trial with community wide wireless which was highly unreliable and cost us about $2,000 for 36 wireless bridges, which are sunk costs (we hope to recover some of this, but probably won't be much). Also, community members, including Norm and others, spent many hours trying to get the wireless service functional, to no avail. Our installation fee of $5,000 was returned to the HOA by the provider because they could not deliver a reliable service. So, Oak Creek Commons members agreed to spend $7,500 to install a wireless internet. $2,000 of that has been spent on bridges. $5,000 remains to guarantee the worst case scenarios of member default on their agreements with the HOA before the Charter deal can be said to have cost any money. Eileen McCourt Oak Creek Commons Cohousing Paso Robles, CA
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.