RE: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:36:44 -0800 (PST) |
Hi Saille, For most of the 1990's I was a group process consultant and I did group decision making and facilitation workshops at dozens of communities of all kinds, including about 25 or so cohousing groups. I regularly wrote about consensus and group process for Communities magazine and the now defunct cohousing journal. There are lots of types of communities, many do not use consensus since they are authoritarian based, e.g. many religious communities do not use consensus process. In my travels and visits with over 150 communities, I watched, learned, and did some teaching about process. What I learned was that the most effective communities, cohousing or otherwise, use a variety of decision making approaches. For example my own community of Sharingwood uses consensus for some things, voting for others, autocratic decisions for others (autocratic means one person decides). These things blend together naturally based on many years of living together, although sometimes we still trip up on some things. Consensus does NOT work well for some groups, and they hurt themselves by trying to force it when it obviously can not work. Much of my consulting work with communities was going in and pointing out their problems, offering methods and ideas for solutions. In a few cases I recommended that they stop using consensus because it could not work in their current environment. For example, Greenpeach international was taken over by a socialist group for awhile, the group simply blocked all proposals, stopping the organization. In this case, consensus could not work because the members of that subgroup did not support the organizations mission, nor did they care at all about the social connections of the group. In this case, the organization changed to voting, the hostile group was no longer able to hold the organizations decision making hostage, and thus left the group. I have also seen similar things with individuals holding up consensus groups by inappropriately blocking all business. A simple voting over ride on consensus failure fixes this. For example, after 3 tries at a consensus a proposal is automatically put to a 3/4th majority vote. I have written a bit on my teachings of Consensus, you can find it on the web at: http://www.ic.org/nica/Process/Consensusbasics.htm http://www.ic.org/nica/book/cover.htm Good luck on your community endeavors, Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Cohousing Snohomish WA 98296 -----Original Message----- From: Saille Warner Norton [mailto:saille [at] swngrrl.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:08 PM To: Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_ Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Hello, I am looking for information concerning consensus practices in established CoHo groups. If anyone can provide information, I'd be very grateful. 1. Are there any established communities who do NOT use consensus? 2. Are there any long established communities (10+ years), using consensus, who are now "dying" because of using CP? I had another questions, but I've forgotten it now. Again, thanks for any info you may have. I'm a big supporter of CP, but have a few folks in our developing group who seem to have a negative view of consensus. Saille When a man moves from nature, his heart becomes hard. - Lakota Proverb In dwelling, live close to the ground. In thinking, keep to the simple. In conflict, be fair and generous. In governing, don't try to control. In work, do what you enjoy. In family life, be completely present. _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/2005
-
Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Saille Warner Norton, March 10 2005
- RE: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Rob Sandelin, March 11 2005
-
Re: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities normangauss, March 11 2005
- RE: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Eileen McCourt, March 11 2005
- Re: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Kevin Wolf, March 11 2005
- Re: Concerning Consensus and established CoHo communities Sharon Villines, March 12 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.